Skip navigation.

Active members

Cohesive design/cohesive planting????

Last post 15-04-2012 11:15 PM by AshFox. 7 replies.

Page 1 of 1 (8 items)

  • 07/12/2010 08:10 PM
    • Blackstart
    • Warwickshire
    • 06 Dec 2010
    • 34
    Top 500 Contributor
    Reply | Contact

     Hi everyone, this is my first post on the forum.  I am interested in all horticultural topics, but recently have been learning about garden design.  Looking at the new RHS level 2 courses there is quite a bit about how to select plants, hard landscape materials, or furniture to ensure that the designs are cohesive.  I realize that this means they should all link together to form one whole harmonious garden but how do you select plants. or hard materials so that they are cohesive?  This seems to be a new ‘buzz’ word or a replacement for unity, but can’t find anything informative on the RHS site.  I’ve been looking through some of the old level 2 Hort 1 + Hort 2 papers but haven’t found anything about cohesive garden planning.  Can anybody help me?  Some current garden design students perhaps who may be more up to date with the newer trending terms may be able to offer some advice…

    Thanks

    Blackstart

  • 11/12/2010 10:30 AM
    • Blackstart
    • Warwickshire
    • 06 Dec 2010
    • 34
    Top 500 Contributor
    Reply | Contact

     Anybody???  I guess this may prove my point that perhaps it is a new 'word' used so it looks different from previous design/planning principles.  I'd really appreciate a reply from any rhs people just to explain why this term has been used.

     Thanks

     Blackstart

  • 12/12/2010 12:33 PM
    • miranda
    • Oxfordshire
    • 17 Nov 2004
    • 4,072
    Top 10 Contributor
    Reply | Contact

    'Cohesive' - that's a new one, Blackstart. Didn't come across it when I was studying and the word 'unity' was used instead, which basically means the same thing. I never figured out exactly what it meant but think that it's about creating a scene where things don't jar.

    Just did a search on 'creating unity in the garden' and got a lot of results. Maybe one of those will cast more light on it.

  • 12/12/2010 09:36 PM
    • Blackstart
    • Warwickshire
    • 06 Dec 2010
    • 34
    Top 500 Contributor
    Reply | Contact

     Hi Miranda, thanks for your reply.  Unity is my guess as well but I guess we will never know why the usually accepted terms for design principles are changed.  One man's unity is another man's cohesion so to speak.  It can still cause confusion though.

     Regards

     Blackstart

  • 13/12/2010 02:53 PM
    • woodyoak
    • southern Ontario, Canada
    • 16 Nov 2008
    • 12
    Top 500 Contributor
    Reply | Contact

    I see 'cohesive' as the next level above 'unity' - i.e. individual spaces within the overall landscape designed with unity in mind; if all those spaces then work together to create a pleasing, integrated larger landscape, that would be cohesive.  On a small scale, unity and cohesion would be much the same but, on a larger scale, there's a difference - i.e. you could have smaller spaces within the overall landscape that exhibit unity but, when you consider all the smaller spaces together, they could lack cohesion so the overall lanscape feel 'off' somehow.  I'm not sure if that's the right way to view things, but that's my interpretation.

  • 14/12/2010 08:58 AM
    • Blackstart
    • Warwickshire
    • 06 Dec 2010
    • 34
    Top 500 Contributor
    Reply | Contact

    Hi woodyoak, thanks for your reply.  I'm getting there I think but can't see any good reason for changing the term unity for cohesion, in smaller gardens.  Plants to make a theme cohesive is I guess a little easier to understand if you have a themed design.  However, many of the show gardens I have seen at the RHS shows have themes but I cannot see any relationship between the theme and the garden that is supposed to represent that theme.  If the designer needs to explain it to me then its not working.

     Regards

     Blackstart

  • 15/02/2012 07:00 PM
    • courierdude
    • cambs/suffolk border
    • 14 Feb 2012
    • 216
    Top 50 Contributor
    Reply | Contact

    hi everyone, first post also. just wanted to add, having just taken my first rhs level 2 exam yesterday where i was confronted with a cohesion issue in my paper. i see cohesive as being opposite to contrived. something to do with the general flow of a garden design as opposed to planting areas that sit uncomfortably with each other, or simply using patio paving that is sympathetic to the house etc. stone paving-being a natural material-is a more cohesive than manufactured concrete slabs. stuff like this and of course there is the aspect of structure and height also that can leave a garden looking empty and sparse if these elements are absent. and then colour and form of course!...and it goes on and on. it some neighbourhoods its probably 'cohesive' to have a burnt out car in your garden!(joke!) its hard to articulate in writing but i like to think i have some idea in my head! )

    energy follows thought
  • 15/04/2012 11:15 PM
    • AshFox
    • Norfolk
    • 15 Apr 2012
    • 6
    Not Ranked
    Reply | Contact

     Hello. I have a few suggestions, but I guess I better add a little disclaimer: I am not qualified, or have taken part in any formal training, but I have researched a lot for the garden Im desining. Hope its helpful anyway!

    Geometry/Form: Depending on the size of the garden, echoe shapes of areas and embrace artistic/mathmatical techniques such as the fibinacci sequence, these evolving patterns and reaped shapes in various sizes will give instant cohesion to your various areas, dont forget to think in 3D. Choose one of two lines of sight that you want to embrace (from the backdoor or seating area orcertain window for example, and have this as a guideline for the flow of shapes/patterns.

    Colour: tonal colours are strong in cohesion. Let the type of soil/light quality dictate your colour scheme ie sun loving plants tend to be bright fiery hues (though nowadays with all the hybrids and intensive breeding this isnt such an issue). If your like contrasting colours choose with care. The right contrast, and echoes of this contrast in different areas will make a strong cohesion, but too cray a contrast will only srve to further break up the areas.A tonal garden I would love to see: say working with fiery coulours, at the front starting with yellows and evolving into oranges into reds into marrons and purples, contrastings drops of each colour into the colour into the colour before: drop of orange in the yellow, red in the orange, cerise into the marron and purple (these drops would work well in tandem with the last point).

     Planting schemes: Depends on the look you want really, but choose plants that not only compliment one another visually but in growth requirements too. Ie an Azer that likes sun could shelter a plant that prefers/pops in a bit of shade like a bluebell or viola. If you have a patch of hostas you love plant some lettuce next to them (there are some lovely varieties like rosso). The leaves will look nice and slugs wil eat the lettuce not your hosta. Put in a few peas (dont bother training just let them romp) if a plant is hungry for nitrates as they nauturally lock it into the soil. This is more of a functional cohesion lol. If going for a natral look choose plants that naturally go together (seems a bt like stating the obvious there ha)

    Architecture (combines with first point really...) if you have a certain shape of plant like a tall spiral cut hedge, or bal shaped shrub echoe this shape in different sizes throughout the garden, the eye will nautrally hop from one to the other regardless of what area they are in bringing cohesion (and can be used to loosen up the colour scheme if you are crafty!ha). Oddly if your landscaping involves squared off shapes, use ball shaped plants, or if the landscaping is circular use tall spikes of planting to break up.

    I would also talk about materias but another poster has already covered that :)