Skip navigation.

Climate Change bamboozles taxpayers

Last post 20-12-2010 1:17 PM by headfullofbees. 52 replies.

Page 1 of 4 (53 items) 1 2 3 4 Next >

  • 04/02/2009 07:11 PM
    Not Ranked
    Reply | Contact

    For the past 70 years I have worked outdoors every single day - except for six years in the army during the second World War and a couple of hospital visits. In almost every daylight hour since leaving school I have been outside growing plants and farming, closely monitoring the weather.

    The world's public have been bamboozled by verbal wizardry from political mush they have taken from the pseudo scientists employed by governments. Never has so much inexact tripe been disseminated in order to raise taxes. The spivs' scam of "carbon swaps" should be rescinded at once, and an investigation made to find out if any parliamentarians, lawyers or bankers have made money out of it. Incidentally, regarding pollution, the much maligned tree X Cupressocyparis leylandii removes some toxic chemicals from the atmosphere and converts them into fertilizers.

    The climate has changed since the formation of the world. Well over 90% of the warmth upon Earth arrives from the sun's radiation(s), possibly 3% man's activities, and a little from volcanic emissions and radioactivity decay from the centre of the Earth. The sun's cycles are mostly unknown.

    The Meteorological Office stated recently there has been no global warming this century (granted only eight years) and expects records to show 2008 to be the coldest so far this century.

    The recent cold spell, with sharp air frost, failed by a whisker to become a strong Easterly fetch from the Arctic via Siberia, Western Russia to Northern Europe, as the synoptic situation did not quite develop to form. The last such spell was in 1976, lasting five weeks into February with frost, day and night, and gales even in London. The worst day was 30th January 1976, with Max -1C, Min -5C, with Force 8 NE. The penetrating frost got into the ground 18 inches and froze water supply pipes. It killed my 20 year old 8 ft high Trachycarpus fortunei. One calm, clear night -18C air frost (screened) was recorded at my home. Nearby a record low for England was registered at Chaldon at -19.5C. Such a spell must return soon, probably lasting weeks, and would wipe out hundreds of thousands of half-hardy plant material.

    If the coming year is as bad or worse than the last two I predict we will have a mini ice age lasting perhaps 100 years, such as Britain has had twice since the Romans left. The Scots abandoned farmlands. It is much better to be too warm than too cold.

    My holding on the North Downs is three-quarters of a mile from the escarpment, where the South Westerly winds deposit more than my fair share of rain. The chalk is between one and five feet down. There are no ditches on the downland as it is so free-draining, but it cannot cope with the new rainfall pattern. It was plum growing land. My little plummery previously produced 10 cwt of fruit per annum but was wiped out seven years ago with water often flowing on and off for weeks. The trees half-leafed out, then died.

    Observations follow of some changes noted in 2008 at my home, and published in my seed exchange list :

    - Rainfall in the year to 31 December 2008 : J 5.13", F 1.90", M 4.90", A 3.09", M 2.68", J 1.54", J 2.14", A 3.47", S 3.76", O 3.52", N 4.30", D 2.70" = 39.13 inches total in the year 2008 (approximately 25% above long-term average).

    - The world cooling of the past three years manifested itself here in many adverse ways during 2008. A mild and very wet winter effectively continued for the rest of the year, with quite frequent incursions of arctic air. Just four summer-like days were recorded in 2008. Parts of the autumn were dry and sunny, at times, but the temperatures still below normal. Snow laid for 48 hours in October, November and December. This was the first time such occurred in 52 years here.

    - At the end of July an incursion of arctic air soon had a number of Tilia and Acer trees rapidly developing autumnal coloured leaves, which of course cannot re-colour, and subsequently fell early.

    - A large number of plants were adorned with rotting seed capsules, in particular Lilium spp.

    - Not one honey bee was observed. The first appearing bumble bees were wiped out by the cold and wet, likewise wasps. Only one small wasp nest was found.

    - The damsons and related small plums flowered early and for a long time. No fruit set, presumably because it was too cold and wet for the pollen to germinate.

    - Early potatoes (Foremost) developed a few tubers, and went into dormancy.

    - A row of parsnips sown late (mid April) produced only three seedlings, the rest of the seeds sown mid-May produced a good germination. In December they still tried to grow, producing 25% of normal weight.

    - On the plus side, the Asian roses were magnificent.

    STOP PRESS - Australia reports January 2009 temperatures of 117F recorded (but higher readings reported 100 years ago).

    We could have fun with this. A recent survey of Members of Parliament - of all parties - asked "How is the world temperature measured?" None knew. What about a survey of those who keep vehemently pushing "climate change"?

    The real calamity coming for Earth is gross overpopulation.

    I wonder if anyone here agrees with anything in my debut posting…?

  • 05/02/2009 08:16 AM
    Top 10 Contributor
    Reply | Contact

    You are confusing 'weather', a highly variable thing, with changes in climate that are subtle and only perceivable over a long period and masked by the extreme variability of weather.  You cannot be blamed as the popular media are poor at explaining this.

    How is temperature measured?  With some difficulty and using a wide range of methods, with supporting evidence that are not temperature measurements as such but phenomena related to climate such as glacier advance/retreat.  Hence the long period of discussion before general agreement on changing climate was reached by the scientific community - this link gives an idea of the techniques used: http://www.cru.uea.ac.uk/cru/data/temperature/ 

     However, facts aside, I thought the rest of your rant, very funny.

    Boggy

    Beware the bat-eared bogweevil
  • 05/02/2009 02:56 PM
    • Susiq
    • Northumberland
    • 16 Feb 2008
    • 3,125
    Top 10 Contributor
    Reply | Contact

    Whether (no pun intended) it is weather or climate changes I firmly believe all these changes are cyclical and has ever been so. I do not believe human intervention has anything to do with it whatsoever. I am totally with HarryOnNorthDowns inasmuch that I think we are being manipulated into paying taxes that will not make one iota of difference to what is happening 'naturally'.

  • 05/02/2009 05:37 PM
    Top 10 Contributor
    Reply | Contact

    Although I am well aware that whatever I or anyone else says nothing will convince climate change sceptics, such comments must be challenged. The evidence is agreed by reputable scientists to support climate change.

    Whether the very few, minor taxes that currently relate to climate change will have any effect is another matter.

    Unfortunately, much more drastic changes will probably be needed and even then the greenhouse gases already in the atmosphere will cause severe changes over the next 50-80 years.

    Wish it was not the case, but it almost certainly is.

    Boggy

    Beware the bat-eared bogweevil
  • 05/02/2009 08:05 PM
    • Roger H
    • Orpington
    • 01 Feb 2009
    • 53
    Top 150 Contributor
    Reply | Contact

    Only time will tell! And probably a few centuries at that, but I think that `climate change` is surely a media driven phenomena rather than something that has been well researched over a long period of time by qualified persons without any hidden agenda.

    Roger H
  • 05/02/2009 09:38 PM
    Top 10 Contributor
    Reply | Contact

    I know it is hard to accept but climate change has been well-researched and despite being immensely complex and full of unknowns the weight of evidence has built up to the point where well-informed people cannot easily dismiss it. I am of course perfectly aware that your mind is probably set, but for others this will help illuminate the facts as understood at the moment: http://www.newscientist.com/topic/climate-change Boggy

    Beware the bat-eared bogweevil
  • 06/02/2009 12:14 PM
    • miranda
    • Oxfordshire
    • 17 Nov 2004
    • 4,072
    Top 10 Contributor
    Reply | Contact

    My view is that whatever is happening to our planet, it's the only one we've got and we need to treat it with a lot more respect than we have been doing. 

  • 06/02/2009 04:39 PM
    • Digger
    • Northern UK
    • 18 Jul 2005
    • 5,230
    Top 10 Contributor
    Reply | Contact

    There are lots of point of view on this contentious subject, right now the climate here is very cold and frozen solid. Damn this blasted climate, i'm sick of the climate and the environment.

    digger Devil Sage of the fells
  • 06/02/2009 08:52 PM
    • Roger H
    • Orpington
    • 01 Feb 2009
    • 53
    Top 150 Contributor
    Reply | Contact

    Thanks for tip re New Scientist, I used to read this mag regularly !1975 - 85! and will look up the article mentioned in order to be better informed than of late!

    Roger H
  • 06/02/2009 10:11 PM
    Not Ranked
    Reply | Contact

    Climate change is something that has been going on thoughout the history of the planet. It will continue to happen.  However the amount of Carbon emmissions that man kind put into the atmosphere is miniscule in comparison to the amount that is already present.  we produce 26.4GTs of carbon per year. There is 7,500GTs of carbon in the atmosphere. Plants consume 220GTs per year.  If more is produced, plant life increases. Carbon also weighs more than air, which makes it impossible to be collecting in the atmosphere. If you don't believe me, fill a balloon with air and see if it takes off, or falls like a rock.  Also if there was a greenhouse effect holding in heat, why when there is no cloud cover does the temp decrease rapidly? 

          Mankind is not the problem, this is a religion, and a fear tactic used by government to control the masses. (in my opinion)

    It is our responsibility to remain skeptical even if it is not politicaly correct to do so. There are plenty of othere people around the globe that refuse to be brainwashed.

     

  • 06/02/2009 10:45 PM
    Top 10 Contributor
    Reply | Contact

    Ah, another one - carbon dioxide is heavier than air but because air moves it all gets stirred up and mixed together. Balloons filled with air tend to sink because the rubber weighs more than air. It is true that as carbon dioxide increases plant growth and this will take more CO2 out of the atmosphere, but not enough and plants die and rot releasing the CO2 back into the atmosphere. Temperature fluctuate depending on cloud cover, but that does not affect the long term trends. Human CO2 output is 26.4 Gt pa, not 75GT. Even if you consider the total greenhouses gases in CO2 equivalents the human output is 49.0 GtCO2-eq. Plants are thought to use 220gt of CO2 per year not 95gt - as these come from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change I have to question the validity of your figures and arguments, and ask that you cite your sources. I would not argue with the need for skepticism, and indeed the science of climate change does not claim to be exact in every particular, merely that the weight of evidence suggest that human activities are causing changes that will have adverse effects on us and the rest of the natural world. As for controlling the masses, governments seem quite good at that without recourse to climate change. Boggy

    Beware the bat-eared bogweevil
  • 07/02/2009 02:12 PM
    • miranda
    • Oxfordshire
    • 17 Nov 2004
    • 4,072
    Top 10 Contributor
    Reply | Contact

     'Mankind is not the problem'

    Are you suggesting then that billions of humans and millions of cars and factories all pumping out garbage are having no effect on the environment? Interesting view point.

     'If more is produced, plant life increases'

    Not if the rise in CO2 isn't matched by water availability. If there isn't sufficient water, then the stomata will close, preventing it from making use of the CO2. As several of the planet's largest rivers no longer reach the sea because of over use (for example, Yellow River, the Euphrates and the Tigris in the Middle East and the Rio Grande in the US), or are so filthy that the water cannot be used, water could become something of an issue.

    You might be interested to read the RHS paper, The physiological basis of plant responses to climate change 

     

     

  • 07/02/2009 04:24 PM
    Not Ranked
    Reply | Contact

    "CO2" poison........

    Seeds (Trees) -- Summary


    .. --> Article Subheading -->How does enriching the air with carbon dioxide impact the reproductive capacity of trees? LaDeau and Clark (2001) addressed this question in a major way when they determined the reproductive response of loblolly pine trees to atmospheric CO2 enrichment at Duke Forest in the Piedmont region of North Carolina, USA, where in August of 1996 three 30-m-diameter FACE rings began to enrich the air around the 13-year-old trees they encircled to 200 ppm above the atmosphere's normal background concentration, while three other FACE rings served as control plots. Because the trees were not mature at the start of the experiment they did not produce any cones until a few rare ones appeared in 1998. By the fall of 1999, however, the two scientists found that, compared to the trees growing in ambient air, the CO2-enriched trees were twice as likely to be reproductively mature, and they produced three times more cones per tree. Similarly, the trees growing in the CO2-enriched air produced 2.4 times more cones in the fall of 2000; and from August 1999 through July 2000, they collected three times as many seeds in the CO2-fertilized FACE rings as in the control rings.

    Also working on this aspect of the Duke Forest FACE study were Hussain et al. (2001), who report that (1) seeds collected from the CO2-enriched trees were 91% heavier than those collected from the trees growing in ambient air, (2) the CO2-enriched seeds had a lipid content that was 265% greater than that of the seeds produced on the ambient-treatment trees, (3) the germination success for seeds developed under atmospheric CO2 enrichment was more than three times greater than that observed for control seeds developed at ambient CO2, regardless of germination CO2 concentration, (4) seeds from the CO2-enriched trees germinated approximately five days earlier than their ambiently-produced counterparts, again regardless of germination CO2 concentration, and (5) seedlings developing from seeds collected from CO2-enriched trees displayed significantly greater root lengths and needle numbers than seedlings developing from trees exposed to ambient air, also regardless of growth CO2 concentration.

    What are the implications of these findings?

    The propensity for elevated levels of atmospheric CO2 to hasten the production of more plentiful seeds on the trees of this valuable timber species bodes well for naturally-regenerating loblolly pine stands of the southeastern United States, where LaDeau and Clark report the trees "are profoundly seed-limited for at least 25 years." Hence, as the air's CO2 content continues to climb, they conclude that "this period of seed limitation may be reduced," which is good news indeed for this highly-prized tree. In addition, the observations of Hussain et al. suggest that loblolly pine trees in a CO2-enriched world of the future will likely display significant increases in their photosynthetic rates. Enhanced carbohydrate supplies resulting from this phenomenon will likely be used to increase seed weight and lipid content. Such seeds should consequently exhibit significant increases in germination success, and their enhanced lipid supplies will likely lead to greater root lengths and needle numbers in developing seedlings. Consequently, when CO2-enriched loblolly pine seedlings become photosynthetically-active, they will likely produce biomass at greater rates than those exhibited by seedlings growing under current CO2 concentrations.

    Five years later, LaDeau and Clark (2006a) conducted a follow-up study that extended the work they had begun five years earlier. This latter effort revealed that "carbon dioxide enrichment affected mean cone production both through early maturation and increased fecundity," so that "trees in the elevated CO2 plots produced twice as many cones between 1998 and 2004 as trees in the ambient plots." They also determined that the trees grown in elevated CO2 "made the transition to reproductive maturation at smaller [trunk] diameters," and that they "not only reached reproductive maturation at smaller diameters, but also at younger ages." By 2004, for example, they say that "roughly 50% of ambient trees and 75% of fumigated trees [had] produced cones." In addition, they observed that "22% of the trees in high CO2 produced between 40 and 100 cones during the study, compared with only 9% of ambient trees."

    "In this 8-year study," in the words of the two researchers, "we find that previous short-term responses indeed persist," in contradiction of the opinions of biological pessimists who downplay the immense biological benefits of atmospheric CO2 enrichment. In addition, they note that "P. taeda trees that produce large seed crops early in their life span tend to continue to be prolific producers (Schutlz, 1997)," and they conclude that this fact, together with their findings, suggests that "individual responses seen in this young forest may be sustained over their life span."

    In a concurrent report, LaDeau and Clark (2006b) additionally analyzed the seed and pollen responses of the loblolly pines to atmospheric CO2 enrichment, finding that the "trees grown in high-CO2 plots first began producing pollen while younger and at smaller sizes relative to ambient-grown trees," and that cone pollen and airborne pollen grain abundances were significantly greater in the CO2-enriched stands. More specifically, they found that "by spring 2005, 63% of all trees growing in high CO2 had produced both pollen and seeds vs. only 36% of trees in the ambient plots."

    This propensity for elevated concentrations of atmospheric CO2 to both hasten and increase the production of pollen by this valuable timber species bodes well for naturally-regenerated loblolly pine stands that have a continuous range from Maryland south to Florida and west to Texas, where they currently are profoundly seed-limited for at least 25 years. In addition, the researchers say that precocious pollen production "could enhance the production of viable seeds by increasing the percentage of fertilized ovules," and that "more pollen disseminated from multiple-source trees may also increase rates of gene flow among stands, and could further reduce rates of self-pollination, indirectly enhancing the production of viable seeds." Also of importance, in view of the negative twists that climate alarmists attempt to put on even overwhelmingly positive research findings, they say that "pine pollen is not a dangerous allergen for the public at large."

    Another major study of the reproductive responses of trees to elevated levels of atmospheric CO2 was conducted at the Kennedy Space Center, Florida, USA, where in 1996 three species of scrub-oak (Quercus myrtifolia, Q. chapmanii, and Q. geminata) were enclosed within sixteen open-top chambers, half of which were maintained at 379 ppm CO2 and half at 704 ppm. Five years later -- in August, September and October of 2001 - Stiling et al. (2004) counted the numbers of acorns on randomly selected twigs of each species, while in November of that year they counted the numbers of fallen acorns of each species within equal-size quadrates of ground area, additionally evaluating mean acorn weight, acorn germination rate, and degree of acorn infestation by weevils.

    So what did they find?

    Acorn germination rate and degree of predation by weevils were unaffected by elevated CO2, while acorn size was enhanced by a small amount: 3.6% for Q. myrtifolia, 7.0% for Q. chapmanii, and 7.7% for Q. geminata. Acorn number responses, on the other hand, were enormous, but for only two of the three species, as Q. geminata did not register any CO2-induced increase in reproductive output, in harmony with its unresponsive overall growth rate. For Q. myrtifolia, however, Stiling et al. report "there were four times as many acorns per 100 twigs in elevated CO2 as in ambient CO2 and for Q. chapmanii the increase was over threefold." On the ground, the enhancement was greater still, with the researchers reporting that "the number of Q. myrtifolia acorns per meter squared in elevated CO2 was over seven times greater than in ambient CO2 and for Q. chapmanii, the increase was nearly sixfold."

    Stiling et al. say these results lead them to believe "there will be large increases in seedling production in scrub-oak forests in an atmosphere of elevated CO2," noting that "this is important because many forest systems are 'recruitment-limited' (Ribbens et al., 1994; Hubbell et al., 1999)," which conclusion echoes that of LaDeau and Clark with respect to loblolly pines. Therefore, and if other trees behave similarly, it would appear that the rising CO2 content of earth's atmosphere will be a great boon to the regenerative prowess of the planet's forests.

    A third major study of CO2 effects on seed production in trees has been conducted at the FACE facility near Rhinelander, Wisconsin (USA), where young paper birch (Betula papyrifera Marsh.) seedlings were planted in 1997 and have been growing since 1998 in open-top chambers maintained at atmospheric CO2 concentrations of either 360 or 560 ppm, as well as at atmospheric ozone (O3) concentrations of either ambient or 1.5 times ambient. There, Darbah et al. (2007) collected many types of data pertaining to flowering, seed production, seed germination and new seedling growth and development over the 2004-2006 growing seasons; and as they describe it, "elevated CO2 had significant positive effectSleep on birch catkin size, weight, and germination success rate." More specifically, they note that "elevated CO2 increased germination rate of birch by 110%, compared to ambient CO2 concentrations, decreased seedling mortality by 73%, increased seed weight by 17% [and] increased [new seedling] root length by 59%."

    Conversely, the six researchers found that "the opposite was true of elevated O3," as it "decreased the germination rate of birch by 62%, decreased seed weight by 25%, and increased [new seedling] root length by [only] 15%." In addition, they note that "the seeds produced under elevated O3 had much less stored carbohydrate, lipids, and proteins for the newly developing seedling to depend on and, hence, the slow growth rate." They also report that "the total number of trees that flowered increased by 139% under elevated CO2 [but only] 40% under elevated O3." Likewise, they say that "with respect to the quantity of flowers produced, elevated CO2 had Angel 262% increase, while that of elevated O3 had [only a] 75% increase compared to the control treatment."

    In discussing their results, Darbah et al. say their findings imply that seedling recruitment in paper birch "will be enhanced under elevated CO2 but reduced under elevated O3," which is another important reason to hope that the air's CO2 content continues to climb as long as the atmosphere's ozone concentration is in a significantly ascending mode, which hope is also justified by the several findings of the researchers who have studied aspects of tree reproduction at the Duke Forest and Kennedy Space Center.

    References
    Darbah, J.N.T., Kubiske, M.E., Nelson, N., Oksanen, E., Vaapavuori, E. and Karnosky, D.F. 2007. Impacts of elevated atmospheric CO2 and O3 on paper Birch (Betula papyrifera): Reproductive fitness. The Scientific World JOURNAL 7(S1): 240-246.

    Hubbell, S.P., Foster, R.B., O'Brien, S.T., Harms, K.E., Condit, R., Wechsler, B., Wright, S.J. and Loo de Lao, S. 1999. Light-gap disturbances, recruitment limitation, and tree diversity in a neotropical forest. Science 283: 554-557.

    Hussain, M., Kubiske, M.E. and Connor, K.F. 2001. Germination of CO2-enriched Pinus taeda L. seeds and subsequent seedling growth responses to CO2 enrichment. Functional Ecology 15: 344-350.

    LaDeau, S.L. and Clark, J.S. 2001. Rising CO2 levels and the fecundity of forest trees. Science 292: 95-98.

    LaDeau, S.L. and Clark, J.S. 2006a. Elevated CO2 and tree fecundity: the role of tree size, interannual variability, and population heterogeneity. Global Change Biology 12: 822-833.

    LaDeau, S.L. and Clark, J.S. 2006b. Pollen production by Pinus taeda growing in elevated atmospheric CO2. Functional Ecology 20: 541-547.

    Ribbens, E., Silander, J.A. and Pacala, S.W. 1994. Seedling recruitment in forests: calibrating models to predict patterns of tree seedling dispersion. Ecology 75: 1794-1806.

    Schutlz, R.P. 1997. Loblolly Pine - The Ecology and Culture of Loblolly Pine (Pinus taeda L.). USDA Forest Service Agricultural Handbook 713. USDA Forest Service, Washington, DC, USA.

    Stiling, P., Moon, D., Hymus, G. and Drake, B. 2004. Differential effects of elevated CO2 on acorn density, weight, germination, and predation among three oak species in a scrub-oak forest. Global Change Biology 10: 228-232.

  • 07/02/2009 04:29 PM
    Not Ranked
    Reply | Contact

    "CO2" poison........

    Seeds (Trees) -- Summary


    .. --> Article Subheading -->How does enriching the air with carbon dioxide impact the reproductive capacity of trees? LaDeau and Clark (2001) addressed this question in a major way when they determined the reproductive response of loblolly pine trees to atmospheric CO2 enrichment at Duke Forest in the Piedmont region of North Carolina, USA, where in August of 1996 three 30-m-diameter FACE rings began to enrich the air around the 13-year-old trees they encircled to 200 ppm above the atmosphere's normal background concentration, while three other FACE rings served as control plots. Because the trees were not mature at the start of the experiment they did not produce any cones until a few rare ones appeared in 1998. By the fall of 1999, however, the two scientists found that, compared to the trees growing in ambient air, the CO2-enriched trees were twice as likely to be reproductively mature, and they produced three times more cones per tree. Similarly, the trees growing in the CO2-enriched air produced 2.4 times more cones in the fall of 2000; and from August 1999 through July 2000, they collected three times as many seeds in the CO2-fertilized FACE rings as in the control rings.

    Also working on this aspect of the Duke Forest FACE study were Hussain et al. (2001), who report that (1) seeds collected from the CO2-enriched trees were 91% heavier than those collected from the trees growing in ambient air, (2) the CO2-enriched seeds had a lipid content that was 265% greater than that of the seeds produced on the ambient-treatment trees, (3) the germination success for seeds developed under atmospheric CO2 enrichment was more than three times greater than that observed for control seeds developed at ambient CO2, regardless of germination CO2 concentration, (4) seeds from the CO2-enriched trees germinated approximately five days earlier than their ambiently-produced counterparts, again regardless of germination CO2 concentration, and (5) seedlings developing from seeds collected from CO2-enriched trees displayed significantly greater root lengths and needle numbers than seedlings developing from trees exposed to ambient air, also regardless of growth CO2 concentration.

    What are the implications of these findings?

    The propensity for elevated levels of atmospheric CO2 to hasten the production of more plentiful seeds on the trees of this valuable timber species bodes well for naturally-regenerating loblolly pine stands of the southeastern United States, where LaDeau and Clark report the trees "are profoundly seed-limited for at least 25 years." Hence, as the air's CO2 content continues to climb, they conclude that "this period of seed limitation may be reduced," which is good news indeed for this highly-prized tree. In addition, the observations of Hussain et al. suggest that loblolly pine trees in a CO2-enriched world of the future will likely display significant increases in their photosynthetic rates. Enhanced carbohydrate supplies resulting from this phenomenon will likely be used to increase seed weight and lipid content. Such seeds should consequently exhibit significant increases in germination success, and their enhanced lipid supplies will likely lead to greater root lengths and needle numbers in developing seedlings. Consequently, when CO2-enriched loblolly pine seedlings become photosynthetically-active, they will likely produce biomass at greater rates than those exhibited by seedlings growing under current CO2 concentrations.

     

  • 07/02/2009 04:33 PM
    Not Ranked
    Reply | Contact

    "CO2" poison........

    A third major study of CO2 effects on seed production in trees has been conducted at the FACE facility near Rhinelander, Wisconsin (USA), where young paper birch (Betula papyrifera Marsh.) seedlings were planted in 1997 and have been growing since 1998 in open-top chambers maintained at atmospheric CO2 concentrations of either 360 or 560 ppm, as well as at atmospheric ozone (O3) concentrations of either ambient or 1.5 times ambient. There, Darbah et al. (2007) collected many types of data pertaining to flowering, seed production, seed germination and new seedling growth and development over the 2004-2006 growing seasons; and as they describe it, "elevated CO2 had significant positive effectSleep on birch catkin size, weight, and germination success rate." More specifically, they note that "elevated CO2 increased germination rate of birch by 110%, compared to ambient CO2 concentrations, decreased seedling mortality by 73%, increased seed weight by 17% [and] increased [new seedling] root length by 59%."

    Conversely, the six researchers found that "the opposite was true of elevated O3," as it "decreased the germination rate of birch by 62%, decreased seed weight by 25%, and increased [new seedling] root length by [only] 15%." In addition, they note that "the seeds produced under elevated O3 had much less stored carbohydrate, lipids, and proteins for the newly developing seedling to depend on and, hence, the slow growth rate." They also report that "the total number of trees that flowered increased by 139% under elevated CO2 [but only] 40% under elevated O3." Likewise, they say that "with respect to the quantity of flowers produced, elevated CO2 had Angel 262% increase, while that of elevated O3 had [only a] 75% increase compared to the control treatment."

    In discussing their results, Darbah et al. say their findings imply that seedling recruitment in paper birch "will be enhanced under elevated CO2 but reduced under elevated O3," which is another important reason to hope that the air's CO2 content continues to climb as long as the atmosphere's ozone concentration is in a significantly ascending mode, which hope is also justified by the several findings of the researchers who have studied aspects of tree reproduction at the Duke Forest and Kennedy Space Center.